Translation errors - Categorized in: Report a Problem

I am working on a french translation of the Tag and Report items (Organize Windows). The following translations don't work.
In the Report tab":
1) "the word: "and"": I translate it by "et", but couples and parents are reported with "and". Ex:
reported: Paul Smith and Marie [Boucher] Smith
should be: Paul Smith et Marie [Boucher] Smith
2) "Everyone Else": I translate it by "Autres personnes", but this title in the report and in the table of contents is reported as "EveryoneElse" .

Others questions:
a) I unselected some tags, in the Tags tab, but they are still reported (in light gray)?

b) I want that wifes be reported with her birth name and not her married name. How I can do that ? (For many years now, wifes keep her birth (first) name when she got married; I can't report them with a name that it knew by nobody).

P.S: Excuse me for mistakes, English is not my first language.

Thank you for answers. Concerning point "b)", my request was not necessary to have a way to do this for a specific person, but to do this globally for all persons (wifes). An indicator in the Behold file should let us choose if we want or not, use husband's surname for wifes. Personnaly I prefere view in the report, the birth surnames as they are stored in the Gedcom file. In this way, you could figure out later, another solution, for a specific person fonctionnality, if necessary.

Hi Louis. I would accept method 3 where Marylin Brown should be only indexed under Brown (her birth surname). With this option we loose some information as you say, but we are sure that this person had be known by this surname sometime in her life (birth, christening, marriage, etc.) (note: we find in the report the "others spouses" of this person, so we can associate her with these others surnames).
Method 2 is an alternative that I prefere to method 1. This way, we don't loose information for women who really be knew by their married name and the birth surname is in "evidence". An inconvenient of this method (and method 1), is that we also report some women with a surname they never had or that nobody know for this person. By example, my wife should be reported with my surname but nobody know her with this surname, and she never use that surname in legal/official document. We introduce, in this case, some "confusion" because we "pretend" that this person has be known with that surname. However, as that surname will be reported between braket, this should be "acceptable".
I let you choose the solution that seem better for you.

Other consideration: I thought we can have multiple NAME tags in a GEDCOM file, by example, when an individual is recorded under different spellings or when an individual changed his/her name by legal or informal process. I think, that should be a (the) way to keep the married name for specific persons, when this information is required. Ex:
1 NAME Marilyn /BROWN/
2 GIVN Marylin
2 SURN BROWN
1 NAME Marilyn /JOHNSON/
2 GIVN Marilyn
2 SURN JOHNSON
2 NOTE Married name
1 NAME Marilyn /SMITH/
2 GIVN Marilyn
2 SURN SMITH
2 NOTE Married name

The surname of these additionnals NAME tags could be append to the birth surname; ex:: Marilyn BROWN (JOHNSON SMITH). If a lot of NAME tags were presents (in case of different spelling or other cases), only surname matching with one the the husband's surname of that woman could be listed.
I understand however that your "actual" solution is "automatic" (based on family records) while this one need that each additonal name (married name in this case) be added (present) in the GEDCOM file for the concerned individual.

Pierre

Thanks.