Louis Kessler’s Behold Blog The Behold User Forum
Brett (brett) Comments and Posts
Results 51 - 60 of 94 total. 36 blog comments. 58 forum posts.
52.
Literally Nothing From RootsMagic - Blog comment by brett - 14 Feb 2012
A few more results, all Opened the file, without any report.
GRAMPS
GENViewer
GENMatcher
53.
Literally Nothing From RootsMagic - Blog comment by brett - 13 Feb 2012
Your comment 'I wonder how bad a problem this is and if there are very many other programs out there that might choke on the “nothing” in the RootsMagic GEDCOM' made me think hard about the same.
Thanks Louis (and Bart) for a copy of the GEDCOM file.
Results for some software include:
Ahnenblatt ...
54.
Literally Nothing From RootsMagic - Blog comment by brett - 13 Feb 2012
You state: 'This code needs to be fast'.
But what actual effect to Behold load time will this do for large GEDCOM files?
55.
Log File hyperlink - Forum post by brett in Questions and Answers - 10 Feb 2012
Again, thanks Louis.
I had been doing it manually and then noticed this old post last night. It is not a problem as such, but would have made my corrections a little faster.
56.
Log File hyperlink - Forum post by brett in Questions and Answers - 9 Feb 2012
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009 you posted:
However, Tamura's review has already led me to think I should reinstitute the logfile that was in versions of Behold up to 2 years ago. It integrates the log and the GEDCOM files together in a window which would allow clicking on an error message and taking you right to the line ...
57.
Date format - GEDCOM 5.5.1 - Forum post by brett in Questions and Answers - 9 Feb 2012
Thanks for the clarification on dates.
58.
Date format - GEDCOM 5.5.1 - Forum post by brett in Questions and Answers - 9 Feb 2012
Thanks Louis.
To continue a little, do you consider BetterGEDCOM would be looking at incomplete dates as part of their charter?
It seems to me that where some data is known, eg only day or month but no year, it needs to be kept in the GEDCOM, and within Behold, as you have stated above.
However, if Behold will ...
59.
Date format - GEDCOM 5.5.1 - Forum post by brett in Questions and Answers - 9 Feb 2012
Where sufficient data is not recorded eg only 13 APR, should the GEDCOM be produced containing or excluding the non valid data?
Is it correct under GEDCOM standard to convert non valid dates to a date phrase?
When 1.5 or 2.0 arrives, how do you think Behold will export date phrase to GEDCOM?
60.
A Review of A Review - Blog comment by brett - 9 Feb 2012
This is great news Louis, although I do not wish to be the cause of any delay in your quest to vs 1.5.
Endless Possibilities - Blog comment by brett - 21 Feb 2012