Louis Kessler’s Behold Blog The Behold User Forum
Blog Comments
342.
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by lkessler - 22 May 2015
Arnold,
In the earlier days, GEDCOM's sources weren't as well developed. I happen to have a small booklet called "PAF Documentation Guidelines, 1995 Edition", produced by the Silicon Valley PAF Users Group. They didn't think PAF's ability to document sources was good enough. They went a step further and ...
343.
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by arnold - 21 May 2015
Louis,
I very much agree that support for sources have been reasonably well covered in GEDCOM - especially, considering when the standard was 'published'.
The (very evident) problem is that the people who write/wrote the software and most of those who used it, were really only name collectors and either, ...
344.
At Last! Finally! All 1.1 changes appear done! - Blog comment by klemens - 18 May 2015
Thank you Louis, that is really good news! Have fun with the documentation!
345.
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by ennoborg - 18 May 2015
Louis,
That's right. You can take elements from A2A, or Dublin Core, whatever you like, but things can get easily out of hand if you take too many. When you need more than a dozen, I think something's wrong.
Enno
346.
At Last! Finally! All 1.1 changes appear done! - Blog comment by deckie49 - 18 May 2015
Is it just me, or is the guy at the computer (gif image on Future Plans page) sitting up taller and typing faster?? :)
347.
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by lkessler - 16 May 2015
Enno,
I am fine with any simple method as you suggest, but we don't want a standard that is a huge elaborate complicated mess.
The point is that GEDCOM may not be the best, but it is able to handle sources despite the statements of many people that it cannot.
Louis
348.
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by ennoborg - 15 May 2015
Louis, yes, it can be done, but I prefer for Film: 1234567, Frame: 344, Line: 28 to appear in separate GEDCOM tags, like FILM, PAGE, and LINE, because that makes things less dependent on language, and more straight-forward to parse, IMO.
Sources referencing other sources with a similar construct to how ...
349.
The Future of Genealogy – 6 Predictions - Blog comment by ennoborg - 16 Apr 2015
Louis, I call it realism. The APIs that I see now serve a vertical market, where data exchange is centralized and controlled by the big companies and FamilySearch, and where, interestingly, when it comes to handling evidence, FamilySearch does a much better job than its commercial partners, as you can read in ...
350.
The Future of Genealogy – 6 Predictions - Blog comment by lkessler - 16 Apr 2015
Very interesting observations, Enno. I don't share your negativism though. I think it is still early in the life of these APIs and they will evolve, maybe even into something quite different that we might not be able to foresee until it happens.
Louis
Is GEDCOM Good For Sources? - Blog comment by arnold - 24 May 2015